Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 A265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

AMD Radeon R7 A265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A265 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 A265 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (825MHz vs 657MHz)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.13GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 A265
0.633 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760M +59%
1.009 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
May 2013
All-In-One
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

725 MHz
Base Clock
628 MHz
825 MHz
Boost Clock
657 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.51 GPixel/s
19.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.05 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
633.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1009 GFLOPS
39.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.05 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
GK106
Opal XT
GPU Variant
N14E-GL-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
55W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy