Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 A360 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

AMD Radeon R7 A360 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A360 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1200MHz vs 1125MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 A360
0.864 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q +184%
2.458 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2020
All-In-One
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1100 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
1125 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
27.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
864.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
864.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
54.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Meso
GPU Name
TU117
Meso XT (216-0864018)
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy