Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 M260 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

AMD Radeon R7 M260 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M260 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 48 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 M260 's Advantages
Boost Clock980MHz
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 M260
0.752 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 48 +880%
7.373 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Mar 2019
Gem System
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

940 MHz
Base Clock
-
980 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
786 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
402.4GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
48
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
3072
24
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.840 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
76.80 GPixel/s
23.52 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
752.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.75 TFLOPS
752.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.373 TFLOPS
47.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
460.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
Vega 10
Topaz XT (216-0858020)
GPU Variant
Vega 10 PRO
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy