Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 151% (2331MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400 +276%
3.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Jan 2022
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
2331 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
12
512
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Navi 24
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy