Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R9 260 OEM and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (80W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 260 OEM
1.971 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +44%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Jul 2020
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
896
Shading Units
896
56
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
80W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
TU116
Bonaire XT (215-0839039)
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy