Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM vs NVIDIA NVS 310

AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM vs NVIDIA NVS 310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R9 260 OEM and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (104.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
848 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 260 OEM +1871%
1.971 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
14
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
48
56
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
GF119
Bonaire XT (215-0839039)
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Board Design

85W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy