Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R9 260 OEM and 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.0GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 260 OEM
1.971 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7500 +518%
12.19 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Aug 2023
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1344 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
172.0GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
1792
56
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.8 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
190.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.37 TFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.19 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
380.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Navi 33
Bonaire XT (215-0839039)
GPU Variant
Navi 33
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy