Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 150W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Jan 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
-
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
RV380
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy