CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
VS
AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 512MB VRAM GeForce 205 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP
+4108%
1.894 TFLOPS
GeForce 205 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 270 1024SP
VS
GeForce 205 OEM
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Nov 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
2
16
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
GT218
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
GT218-200-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Board Design
150W
TDP
31W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
2
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
3
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
4
AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
5
ATI Radeon X1550 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
6
AMD FirePro S9100 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
7
AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs ATI Radeon HD 5770 Mac Edition
8
AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs AMD Radeon RX 480
9
AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT
10
AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy