Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 315 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP +4108%
1.894 TFLOPS
GeForce 315 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Feb 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1024
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
33W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GT218
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
GT218-300-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy