Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP +604%
1.894 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 620
0.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
May 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1024
Shading Units
96
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
49W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GF108
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
GF108-100-KB-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy