Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1280GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 152.0GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 210W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP +44%
1.894 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
1.312 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Nov 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1280MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
152.0GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
1024
Shading Units
448
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
640 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.50 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
40.99 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1312 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
164.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
210W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GF110
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
GF110-270-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
3 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy