Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 78% (1650MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (85W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP
1.894 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5300 +123%
4.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Aug 2020
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1280
64
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.448 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.224 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
264.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
85W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Navi 14
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XE
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy