Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5500 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 90% (1757MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (125W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP
1.894 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5500 XT +185%
5.398 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Aug 2020
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1187 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1757 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
24
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.22 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
168.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.80 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.398 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
337.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
125W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Navi 14
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy