Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 375W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1000MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP
1.894 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2 +116%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
950 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
375W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Tahiti
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy