Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs NVIDIA T600

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs NVIDIA T600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 4GB VRAM T600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T600 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (1335MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP +10%
1.894 TFLOPS
T600
1.709 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Apr 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
735 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
1024
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
53.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.418 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.709 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
53.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
40W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
TU117
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy