Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 270 vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe

AMD Radeon R9 270 vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 and 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 83% (1695MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270
2.368 TFLOPS
A16 PCIe +83%
4.339 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Apr 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
885 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
231.9GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
1280
Shading Units
1280
80
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.24 GPixel/s
74.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.339 TFLOPS
2.368 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.339 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

Curacao
GPU Name
GA107
Curacao PRO (215-0848000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
212 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy