Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD FirePro RG220

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD FirePro RG220

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1712 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280 +4080%
3.344 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
May 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro RG
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
1
1792
Shading Units
80
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
M93
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Board Design

200W
TDP
35W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy