Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GSO 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
1744 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 's Advantages
Lower TDP (90W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280 +2043%
3.344 TFLOPS
GeForce 9600 GSO 512
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Oct 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
1792
Shading Units
48
112
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
156.0 GFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

200W
TDP
90W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
G94
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
G94-300-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy