Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs ATI FirePro V7770

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs ATI FirePro V7770

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 33.60GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V7770 's Advantages
Lower TDP (76W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280 +234%
3.344 TFLOPS
FirePro V7770
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Jan 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1050 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
33.60GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
800
112
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

200W
TDP
76W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV770
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy