Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280 +80%
3.344 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 SDI
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
May 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1280
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x SDI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Cayman
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy