Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs ATI FirePro V9800

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs ATI FirePro V9800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (200W vs 250W)
ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280 +22%
3.344 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800
2.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Sep 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1600
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Cypress
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy