Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD FirePro W5000 DVI

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD FirePro W5000 DVI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W5000 DVI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W5000 DVI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280 +163%
3.344 TFLOPS
FirePro W5000 DVI
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Feb 2013
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy