Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1760 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280 +3615%
3.344 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
0.09 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Jan 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
1792
Shading Units
32
112
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
89.60 GFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

200W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
G96C
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy