Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 SE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280 +346%
3.344 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460 SE
0.749 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Nov 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
1792
Shading Units
288
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.800 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
748.8 GFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
62.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GF104
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
GF104-225-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy