Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 98% (1845MHz vs 933MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280
3.344 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 XT +55%
5.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Oct 2019
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
1670 MHz
933 MHz
Boost Clock
1845 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1408
112
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.04 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
162.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.39 TFLOPS
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
324.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 14
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy