Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2008 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X +12700%
4.096 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jan 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
40
128
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV620
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy