Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X vs AMD FirePro S7150

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs AMD FirePro S7150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X +8%
4.096 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150
3.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Feb 2016
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
2048
128
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Tonga
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
5 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy