Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X vs ATI FirePro V5700

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs ATI FirePro V5700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X and 512MB VRAM FirePro V5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V5700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (56W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X +814%
4.096 TFLOPS
FirePro V5700
0.448 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Aug 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
320
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.600 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
448.0 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
56W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV730
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
RV730 XT (215-0719047)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy