Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X vs ATI FirePro V7800

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs ATI FirePro V7800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V7800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X +103%
4.096 TFLOPS
FirePro V7800
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Apr 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1440
128
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Cypress
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy