Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X vs AMD FirePro W8000

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X +26%
4.096 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1792
128
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Tahiti
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy