Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
2000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X +2525%
4.096 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Oct 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
2048
Shading Units
48
128
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
156.0 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
G94B
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
G94-300-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy