Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
1976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X +2078%
4.096 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Feb 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
9
2048
Shading Units
72
128
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
43W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GT215
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy