Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 640 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X +491%
4.096 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 640
0.693 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.216 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.86 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
692.7 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
28.86 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
65W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GK107
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
GK107-300-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy