Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X +958%
4.096 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Mar 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
2048
Shading Units
128
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
G92B
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy