AMD Radeon R9 280X vs Moore Threads MTT S2000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X
4.096 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+160%
10.65 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
850 MHz
Base Clock
1300 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
4096
128
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
Tahiti XTL
(215-0821065)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
Unknown
352 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
