Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
May 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
-
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
Unknown
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV560
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
RV560 GT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.312 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
230 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy