Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs ATI Radeon HD 5950

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs ATI Radeon HD 5950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 1024MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 5950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 5950 's Advantages
Lower TDP (302W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2 +96%
4.096 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 5950
2.088 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Evergreen
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1440
128
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.088 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

375W
TDP
302W
750 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x DisplayPort 1.1
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Hemlock
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
Hemlock PRO
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy