Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs ATI FirePro V7760

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs ATI FirePro V7760

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7760 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
1248 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V7760 's Advantages
Lower TDP (76W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2 +241%
4.096 TFLOPS
FirePro V7760
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
27.20GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
800
128
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

375W
TDP
76W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV770
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy