Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs ATI FirePro V9800

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs ATI FirePro V9800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (250W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2 +50%
4.096 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800
2.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Sep 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1600
128
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
250W
750 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Cypress
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy