Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2 +2460%
4.096 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
0.16 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
2048
Shading Units
64
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

375W
TDP
105W
750 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
G92
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy