Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 645 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 91.87GB/s)
1760 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (102W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2 +358%
4.096 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 645 OEM
0.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
957 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
91.87GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
2048
Shading Units
288
128
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.312 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.25 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
894.0 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.50 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
102W
750 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GF114
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy