Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1808 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (289W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2 +587%
4.096 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
448bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
2048
Shading Units
240
128
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
289W
750 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GT200B
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy