Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 74% (1740MHz vs 1000MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (90W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2
4.096 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB +73%
7.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2022
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
1545 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
1740 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
2048
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.127 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.127 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
111.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GA107
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
GA107-140-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

375W
TDP
90W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy