CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA NVS 310
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA NVS 310
VS
AMD Radeon R9 280X2
NVIDIA NVS 310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
2000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2
+3996%
4.096 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2
VS
NVS 310
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
950 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
2048
Shading Units
48
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
375W
TDP
20W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
GF119
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300
2
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
3
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs ATI Radeon HD 3470
4
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
5
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD FirePro RG220A
6
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI
7
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs ATI Radeon HD 3450
8
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA RTX A400
9
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs Intel Arc Pro A50
10
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
Related News
1
AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT
2
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
3
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
4
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
5
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
6
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
7
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
8
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
9
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
10
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy