Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA NVS 310

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA NVS 310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
2000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2 +3996%
4.096 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
2048
Shading Units
48
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
20W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GF119
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy