Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800X

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 109% (2087MHz vs 1000MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (200W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2
4.096 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800X +291%
16.03 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
1800 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
2087 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
60
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
3840
128
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
200.4 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
500.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.06 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.03 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1002 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
200W
750 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
Apple MPX

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 21
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XLA
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy