CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP
VS
AMD Radeon R9 280X2
AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 640SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2
+245%
4.096 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 350 640SP
1.184 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2
VS
Radeon R7 350 640SP
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2019
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
950 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
10
2048
Shading Units
640
128
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.80 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1184 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.00 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Board Design
375W
TDP
55W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2
2
AMD Radeon 780M vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2
3
AMD Radeon Pro V5300X vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2
4
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2
5
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2
6
AMD Radeon 660M vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2
8
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP
9
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI
10
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD Radeon HD 8860 OEM
Related News
1
The P-Cores and E-Cores in Arrow Lake Will Be Interleaved, Reducing Core Communication Latency and Improving Heat Dissipation
2
Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits
3
Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU
4
Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4
5
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
6
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
7
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
8
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
9
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
10
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy