Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 640SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2 +245%
4.096 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 350 640SP
1.184 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2019
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
640
128
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.80 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1184 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
55W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy