Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1050MHz vs 1000MHz)
Lower TDP (65W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2 +408%
4.096 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2013
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
65W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Oland
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy