Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 340 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (1000MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2 +583%
4.096 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 340 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
May 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
599.0 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.44 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
50W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Oland
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy