Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs ATI Radeon X1650

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs ATI Radeon X1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
-
128
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

375W
TDP
Unknown
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV516
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.105 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy